|
On Monday, November 2, 2009, Managing Partner Lance K. Oliver spoke at the NASP 2009 Annual Conference in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Lance K. Oliver |
|
PLAYING IT SAFE: Using Your Poker Face to Scare Off the Fair Debt Collection Act
Jodi Bishop Runger |
|
Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Estate of Anthony Arachikavitz: Court Recognizes ERISA Plan's Priority Over Medical Providers
Polly M. Haley |
|
HEALTHCARE SUBROGATION TRILOGY: Sorting Out the Three Cases Decided by the Supreme Court in 2006 in Order to Maximize Subrogation Recoveries in 2007 and Beyond
Thomas H. Lawrence |
|
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES GOT YOU SICK?
Edwin (Win) L. Rawson |
|
GETTING BACK ON THE ROAD TO RECOVERY: Showing Healthcare Plans How to Succeed in Made Whole States
Tanya C. Holmes |
|
DON?T WRECK YOUR HEALTHCARE AUTO CASE: How to Properly Pursue Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Claims
Kimberly M. Popilek |
|
WHO SHOT Knudson? The Supreme Court?s Holding in Sereboff v. Mamsi Proves to be the Healthcare Cliffhanger of the Millennium
Lance K. Oliver |
|
What is “Materially Adverse to a Reasonable Employee” is Now the Standard for Retaliation Claims.
Julie Y. McLaughlin |
|
Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.: The U.S. Supreme Court clarifies the holding of Great-West v. Knudson
Edwin (Win) L. Rawson |
|
The Tennessee Court of Appeals Finds That Courts Must Engage in an Analysis of the Dollar Amounts of an Insured’s Recovery and Losses in Order to Determine if an Insured has Been “Made Whole.”
Julie Y. McLaughlin |
|
The Supreme Court Gives Employees the “Green Light"to File Disparate Impact Claims Under the ADEA
John M. Russell |
|
Employers in the Sixth Circuit are no Longer Safe from Disparate Impact Claims by Complying With the EEOC’s Four-Fifths Rule
Julie Y. McLaughlin |
|
UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am. v. Toomey: Court Holds that ERISA-Covered Disability Plan is Entitled to Reimbursement of Overpayments under the Federal Common Law Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment.
J. Matthew Stephens |
|
Mid Atlantic Medical v. Sereboff: The Fourth Circuit Holds That Health Plans May Bring Actions in Federal Court Under 502(a)(3) to Obtain Equitable Restitution From Funds held in an Investment Account.
Edwin (Win) L. Rawson |
|
Levine v. United Healthcare Corporation: Court Holds that Perreira is Preempted by ERISA and Not Saved under ERISA’s “Savings Clause”
Thomas H. Lawrence |
|
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila: The Supreme Court Rules That ERISA Completely Pre-Empts State-Law Claims by Plan Participants Against HMO
John M. Russell |
|
B.P. Amoco Corp. v. Connell: The Middle District of Georgia Holds That Health Plans May Bring Actions in Federal Court Under ERISA Section 502(a)(3) to Obtain Equitable Restitution From Trustee of
a Special Needs Trust
Thomas H. Lawrence |
|
Bauhaus v. Bill Benson, Chancery Court Clerk and Bancorp South : Court Distinguishes Knudson and Holds That Health Plan is Entitled to Imposition of a Constructive Trust
Thomas H. Lawrence |
|
Forsling v. J.J. Keller & Associates : Court Distinguishes Knudson and Holds That Health Plan is Entitled to Restitution and Holds "Make-Whole" and "Common Fund" Exceptions Inapplicable
Thomas H. Lawrence |
|
Great-West v. Knudson: Funds Must Be in the Control of the Defendant in Order to Pursue a Subrogation/Reimbursement Claim under ERISA
Thomas H. Lawrence |
|
Great-West Life v. Randall Brown: Court Distinguishes Knudson and Holds That Great-West is Entitled to Restitution
Thomas H. Lawrence |
|
Bauer v. Gylten: Federal court authorizes ERISA reimbursement claim for constructive trust where funds are identifiable and traceable.
John M. Russell |
|
Mills Companies Employee Welfare Benefit Trust v. Russ : Federal court authorizes ERISA reimbursement claim for constructive trust where funds are identifiable and traceable
John M. Russell |
|
Westaff (USA), Inc. v. Arce: Court Follows Knudson and Finds No Remedy for Plan Where Complaint Did Not Seek Restitution
Thomas H. Lawrence |
|
University of Tennessee professor reviews "ERISA Subrogation"
Thomas H. Lawrence |